Legal Opinion
Tinsley v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1983No. Docket Nos. 50497, 50997PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
We consider in this appeal the constitutionality and effect of article I, section 7 of the California Constitution, amended by passage of Proposition 1 by the electorate on November 6, 1979.
Appellants are guardian ad litem parents and their children, the latter of whom either attend or are eligible to attend schools operated by the respondent school districts. They filed a petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) on October 5, 1978, alleging interdistrict segregation of respondents’ schools and seeking an order compelling respondents to submit a reasonably…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- California Gillnetters Ass'n v. Department of Fish & GameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Horwath v. City of East Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- HORNEFF v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.