City of Detroit v. Detroit Edison Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.
A smoke inspector employed by the air pollution control bureau of the city of Detroit often stationed himself 700 feet from the smoke stacks of defendant-appellant and compared the color, of the emissions coming from them with the colors known by him to be given on the Ringelmann chart, the measurement of density of air pollution used by the city. The color of the emissions observed was darker than that permissible and defendant was eventually found to be criminally guilty of 28 violations of § 2.2A of the- air pollution control code of the city of Detroit.1
In this appeal, defendant alleges…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. GouldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Kalita v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. WhaleyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1980