Legal Opinion
People v. Goulding
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1936No. Docket No. 118, Calendar No. 38,552PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
The complaint, warrant and information charged that defendant opened, operated and maintained a private employment agency “where a fee was then and'there charged to persons seeking employment.” The form of the complaint, warrant and information indicates they were made under Act No. 255, Pub. Acts 1925. They are in the language of that statute, which statute was repealed by Act No. 321, Pub. Acts 1929 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8584 et seq.).
Section 3, Act No. 321, Pub. Acts 1929 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8586), provides:
“No person shall open, operate or maintain an employment agency in the State of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Tozer v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1892
- Cleveland Rolling Mill v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. DeyU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1888
- Matter of StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. LlewellynMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. DempsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. PinkneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.