Sykes v. Hannawalt
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Walsh County; Templeton, J. Action by T. L. Sykes against G. S. Hannawalt. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.
Both parties to this action claim the right to an amount of money that was due from one Kennedy for threshing performed for him in the fall of 1893. The threshing was done by one Fred Schimming, with amachine owned by him. Defendant and appellant, Hannawalt was hired by Schimming, and worked for him in threshing a portion of that season, including the threshing done for Kennedy. Schimming failed to pay Hannawalt for such labor, and Hannawalt brought suit in Justice’s Court to recover the amount, and, having obtained judgment, execution was issued and levied upon the balance in Kennedy’s *336hands…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Union National Bank v. OiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Tingle Adm'r v. FisherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Hanson v. BlumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Thompson Yards, Inc. v. RichardsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Bidgood v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. SkauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.