Legal Opinion

Southeastern Liquid Fertilizer Co. v. Mock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1955No. 35729PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Negligence, to be actionable, must be the proximate cause or concurring proximate cause of the injuries received. Holbrooks v. Ford Rental System, 34 Ga. App. 588 (130 S. E. 363); Whitaker v. Jones, McDougald, Smith Pew Co., 69 Ga. App. 711 (26 S. E. 2d 545). Two acts are here alleged as negligence, one being the flashing of a bright light upon the plaintiff. According to the allegations of the petition, when construed most strongly against the pleader, this act took place when the plaintiff had approached so closely to the defendant’s tractor that he was unable to stop in any event.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Jones, McDougald, Smith, Pew Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  2. Tyson v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Holbrooks v. Ford Rental SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jamison v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
  2. Teppenpaw v. BlaylockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Tucker v. Star Laundry & Cleaners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Reynolds v. RentzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Sheppard v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API