Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Star Laundry & Cleaners, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1959No. 37777, 37778PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eelton, Chief Judge.

As to the demurrers of the defendants Harris and the Star Laundry & Cleaners, Inc., we think the court properly sustained them. Negligence is not actionable unless it is the proximate or concurring proximate cause of the injuries received. Georgia Power Co. v. Blum, 80 Ga. App. 618, 628 (57 S. E. 2d 18); Southeastern Liquid Fertilizer Co. v. Mock, 92 Ga. App. 270 (88 S. E. 2d 531). Under the allegations of the petition Hands’ negligence in stopping his truck suddenly and without warning was not a concurring proximate cause of the injuries sued for. After the alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Southeastern Liquid Fertilizer Co. v. MockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stone's Independent Oil Distributors v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Hodge v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Perry v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Teppenpaw v. BlaylockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Harrison v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API