Legal Opinion

Teppenpaw v. Blaylock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 1972No. 47139PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

In this action by a four-year-old minor for damages for personal injuries, the verdict finding the defendant "not guilty of negligence” and the judgment in favor of the defendant, were authorized by evidence that the plaintiff girl, who was under the "supervision” of an adult baby-sitter, was playing in a park across the street from the sitter’s apartment, from which the sitter could watch her; that the sitter was aware that the street was a dangerous one with respect to traffic and children; that when the plaintiff got ready to come back across the street some three or four…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Crawford v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Riggs v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Richards v. HarpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Boatright v. SosebeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. PoteetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Levangie v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Carolyn Cain, Mother of Mary C. Cain, Deceased, Cross-Appellee v. Frederick K. Vontz, D/B/A the Springs Apartments of MacOn Georgia, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Hammonds v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Harris v. HardmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API