Legal Opinion

Holbrooks v. Ford Rental System

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1925No. 16671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

Plaintiff, aged ten, by his next friend, sued Ford Bental System, a partnership composed of Charlie and Phil Men'delsohn, for damages alleged to have been inflicted upon him by reason of a collision of the defendant’s Ford automobile with him while he was crossing a public highway. At the time of the collision the automobile was rented to Alex Dixon and Joe McCarver, and was being driven by the former in an easterly direction on the Alabama public road towards Eome. The allegations of negligence, briefly stated, are: (1) When defendant let out said automobile the brakes were so loose and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. PairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mason v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Southeastern Liquid Fertilizer Co. v. MockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. De Bord v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Springer v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API