Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 9, 1961No. 33PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

This is an action seeking to enforce the restrictive provisions of an alleged employment contract and for damages for its breach. The material aver-ments of the complainant’s bill were that it employed the defendant as a full-time, salaried insurance agent on September 1, 1952, and that the defendant’s employment continued without interruption until it was terminated by complainant on December 5, 1959. The last contract of employment was executed on January 1, 1957 and provided, in part, as follows:

“5. Salesman agrees that he will not, within a period of two years following the date of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Briggs v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Matthews v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Arkansas Dailies, Inc. v. DanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  4. Turner v. AbbottTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. First National Bank of Lenoir City v. IvieCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Vantage Technology, LLC v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Allright Auto Parks, Inc. v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. James S. Kemper & Co. v. Cox & AssociatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Pate v. City of MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Koehler v. CummingsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API