Legal Opinion

Taylor v. S. & N. Alabama R. Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided July 1, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Heard upon demurrer to amended bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Bruce, D. J.

The amended bill assails the title and right of tbe Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company to the two millions capital stock in the South & North Alabama Eailroad Company, issued to the Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company, as the successor and assignee of Tate and associates in their contract with the South & North Alabama Eailroad Company, for the building and equipment of their road—the South & North Alabama Eailroad.

By the terms of the contract between the South & North Alabama Eailroad Company and Sam Tate and associates, of date March 21, 1871, it agreed to “issue to Sam…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. National Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Burke v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R. v. Continental Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. Butler v. Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. McCampbell v. Fountain Head RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Havird v. LungIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In re Sharood Shoe Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API