Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Mighty Movers, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2004No. 73005-9PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Under a city ordinance prohibiting the posting of signs on city property, the city of Seattle (City) billed Mighty Movers, Inc., for the costs of removing signs it had posted on utility poles. When Mighty Movers refused to pay the costs, the City filed this action to recover them. Mighty Movers challenged the constitutionality of the ordinance under article I, section 5 of the Washington State Constitution. The trial court upheld the constitutionality of the ordinance on the basis that a utility pole is a nonpublic forum, the ordinance is reasonable in light of the purposes of utility poles,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bradburn v. NORTH CENT. REGIONAL LIBRARYWashington Supreme Court · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API