Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2008No. 78946-1PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

The question before us is whether random and suspicionless drug testing of student athletes violates article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution.1

Sanders, J.

¶2 The Wahkiakum School District (school district) randomly drug tests all student athletes under the authority of Wahkiakum School Board Policy No. 3515 (policy 3515). Aaron and Abraham York and Tristan Schneider played sports for Wahkiakum High School, agreed to the policy, and were tested. Their parents (York and Schneider parents) sued the school district alleging its drug testing policy violated article I, section 7…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. ValdezWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SieyesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Briggs v. Nova ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Briggs v. Nova ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API