Legal Opinion
Klein v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1988No. Docket Nos. H003537, H003579, H003747PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CAPACCIOLI, J.
We consolidate these related petitions for writs of mandate which raise three questions: first, should the trial court have granted defendants’ motion for a stay on the ground of forum non conveniens (Code Civ. Proc., § 410.30) because of an earlier filed pending action in Switzerland; second, should defendants’ motion to recuse plaintiffs’ counsel have been granted because a member of that law firm formerly represented defendant Arturo Klein; third, did the trial court err in ordering lis pendens notices on defendant Arturo Klein’s property reinstated as a sanction for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
- Arno v. Club Med Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Jessen v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Henriksen v. Great American Savings & LoanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.