Legal Opinion
United States v. Mandujano
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 19, 1976No. 74-754PublishedCited by 510 opinions
1Judgment of the CourtChief Justice Burger
This case presents the question whether the warnings called for by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), must be given to a grand jury witness who is called to testify about criminal activities in which he may have been personally involved; and whether, absent such warnings, false statements made to the grand jury must be suppressed in a prosecution for perjury based on those statements.(1)
During the course of a grand jury investigation into narcotics trafile in San Antonio, Tex., federal prosecutors assigned to the Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force learned of an undercover…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by510 opinions
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
505 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.