Legal Opinion

Riley Motor Co. v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1937No. 27113PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

As the parties to this appeal retain the same position as they did in the trial court, we will refer to the plaintiff in error as plaintiff and the defendant in error as defendant.

January 13, 1934, defendant purchased an automobile from plaintiff and in part payment executed a note to the plaintiff for $457, bearing interest at 10 per cent, per annum, payments to be made in installments, and on the same day gave the plaintiff a mortgage ■ on the automobile to secure the payment of the note.

The defendant made payments from time to time on this note up to and including April 1, 1935, at which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Acme Harvesting MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Remington Typewriter Co. v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Riedman v. MacHtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Waldrop v. Automobile Sales Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KeosababianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API