Legal Opinion

People v. Keosababian

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1946No. Crim. No. 3949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of robbery in the first degree after trial by jury, defendant appeals.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), and pursuant to the rules set forth in People v. Pianezzi, 42 Cal.App.2d 265, 269 et seq. [108 P.2d 732], the essential facts are:

On March 29, 1945, at about 5 p. m., the complaining witness, Mr. John L. Bath, was employed as a service station operator at a station located on East Firestone Boulevard in the county of Los Angeles. Mr. Bath heard a noise and as he turned around Howard Bernard pointed a .45 calibre…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. De MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. O'BrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API