Legal Opinion

Waldrop v. Automobile Sales Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1919No. 6 Div. 410PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County; Henry B. Foster, Judge. Action by the Automobile Sales Company against W. W. Waldrop. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Foye Black entered into a contract with the plaintiff for the purchase of an automobile. This contract was executed at Memphis, Tenn., on December 30, 1916, and contained the following provisions:

‘The title to and right of possession of said motorcar shall remain in you (plaintiff) until conveyed or until the full purchase price is paid in money,” also: “Price of motorcar with following equipment, $775.00. For the motorcar and equipment as above specified, I agree to 'pay the sum of $775.00, as follows: by cash deposit accompanying this order, $75.00; trade in one Saxon roadster [his equity]…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Finney v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Shenandoah Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  4. Borland v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Maisel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riley Motor Co. v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API