Legal Opinion

Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford County

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1970No. 8887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Presiding Judge.

Defendant school district’s first appeal in this case was dismissed because it appealed from the unappealable “order and judgment overruling defendant’s motion for summary judgment.” Hoevelman v. Reorganized Sch. D. R2 of Crawford Co., Mo.App., 430 S.W.2d 753. This second appeal by defendant is from a $580 verdict-judgment returned and entered for plaintiff in his suit to collect the balance allegedly due him under a nine-month school bus driver’s contract. Defendant contends the contract was void because it did not meet the requirements of § 432.070.1

Irrespective of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Hudgins v. Mooresville Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Millar v. BergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Hart v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Tate v. School District No. 11Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cragin v. LobbeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. King v. CliftonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kish v. Chilhowee R-IV School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Public Water Supply District No. 16 v. City of BucknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Sadler v. Board of Education of Cabool School District R-4Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API