Millar v. Berg
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
Plaintiff below claimed $25,000 as damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when he was struck by an automobile owned and operated by defendant. The jury found for plaintiff and assessed his damages at $4,500. The trial court sustained plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the issue of damages only on the ground that the verdict was grossly inadequate. Defendant, who filed no after-trial motion, has appealed and contends that the court erred because it should have sustained defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence (and thus that…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Romandel v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Ukman v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Oganaso v. MellowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Clay v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Goede v. Aerojet General Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Boone v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Fallert Tool & Engineering Co. v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Frisella v. Reserve Life Insurance Co. of DallasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Morris v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.