Legal Opinion

Millar v. Berg

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 13, 1958No. 46478PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

Plaintiff below claimed $25,000 as damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when he was struck by an automobile owned and operated by defendant. The jury found for plaintiff and assessed his damages at $4,500. The trial court sustained plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the issue of damages only on the ground that the verdict was grossly inadequate. Defendant, who filed no after-trial motion, has appealed and contends that the court erred because it should have sustained defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence (and thus that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Romandel v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Ukman v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Oganaso v. MellowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Clay v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Goede v. Aerojet General Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Boone v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Fallert Tool & Engineering Co. v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Frisella v. Reserve Life Insurance Co. of DallasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Morris v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API