Legal Opinion

Faessler v. Turney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1994No. WCB 92-00587; CA A78400Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Employers seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that claimant’s injury was within the course and scope of his employment and therefore compensable. We affirm.

The Board found that employers, who are claimant’s stepfather (Faessler) and mother, operate a dairy farm. In November, 1989, claimant was working full time for them as a farm laborer. Saturday was claimant’s regular day off, but he would sometimes help with farm chores when he would otherwise be off work. Employers had an unwritten policy that prohibited drinking alcoholic beverages while working;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Preston v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Underwood v. Pendleton Grain GrowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API