Legal Opinion
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1974No. 73 Civ. 2220-CLBPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REARGUMENT
BRIEANT, District Judge.
A motion by defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs for a reargument of this Court's Memorandum decision of May 9, 1974, or alternatively, for certification of an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), compels the conclusion that our recent decision was ill considered. It should be, and is in all respects withdrawn and vacated, and the following is substituted.
We begin de novo. On June 30, 1969, the named individual third-party defendants (referred to for convenience as “the Bradley family,” or “the Bradleys”) owned all of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,926 Heizer Corporation v. Jordon RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- In Re Olympia Brewing Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.