Legal Opinion
Glamorise Foundations Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 27, 1987No. Court 86-06-00746PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWMAN, Senior Judge.
Defendant’s concurrent motions to vacate a stipulated judgment on an agreed statement of facts and to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction is granted since at the time the action was commenced, plaintiff admittedly had not paid all liquidated duties, as' required by 28 U.S.C. § 2637(a). The provision in section 2637(a) with respect to the payment of all liquidated duties at the time the action is commenced is a strict requirement for invoking the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade in an action brought under 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Georgetown Steel Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Mildred A. McLearn v. Cowen & Co. And Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Nec Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- American Air Parcel Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Basf Colors & Chemicals, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Syva Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Penrod Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Dazzle Mfg., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Melco Clothing Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Apex Oil Co. v. United States Customs Service (In Re Apex Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.