Legal Opinion

Fradkin v. Ernst

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 1, 1983No. C83-1323APublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and JUDGMENT ENTRY

DOWD, District Judge.

This case involves a challenge to the implementation of the 1983 stock option plan (Plan) for the senior executives of Mohawk Rubber Company (Mohawk). The Plan was approved by Mohawk’s Directors on January 4, 1983, and presented to and allegedly approved by the shareholders at Mohawk’s Annual Meeting. Plaintiff contends that a proxy statement issued to shareholders describing the Plan prior to the Annual Meeting violated the federal securities laws. Plaintiff also argues that the Plan constitutes corporate waste and that the Plan was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Berlin v. Emerald PartnersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. In Re BankAmerica Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
  3. Frary v. Shorr Paper Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  4. Hood v. Smith's Transfer Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1991
  5. Drage v. Procter & GambleOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API