Legal Opinion
Hood v. Smith's Transfer Corp.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 25, 1991No. C 87-0527-L(B)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BALLANTINE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendants to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint in its entirety. For the reasons explained below, defendants’ motion is denied in part and granted in part.
BACKGROUND
This action involves a dispute concerning an employee stock option plan created by defendant Smith’s Transfer Corporation (“Smith’s”) for the voluntary participation of both its union and non-union employees. Plaintiffs allege numerous causes of action, including claims under the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1242;…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Richard L. Britt and Timothy Jackson, Jr. v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc., James E. Hamilton v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Uselton v. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Underwood v. Venango River Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & "Erisa" Litigation v. UBS PaineWebber, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.