Legal Opinion

In Re Surgent

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

After considering three complaints against respondent the District Ethics Committee for Passaic County issued presentments on two of the matters and recommended a private reprimand on the third. Thereafter the Disciplinary Review Board, upon a review of the full record and following a hearing, agreed with the local Committee’s determination that Mr. Surgent had engaged in improper and unethical conduct. The Board recommended that this Court issue a public reprimand and charge respondent for the actual cost of disbursements for stenographic transcripts arising out of these disciplinary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re PalmieriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. In Re ContiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. In Re MoccoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of ReissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. In Re BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Matter of SurgentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of TemplinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. In re CoughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API