Legal Opinion

Matter of Reiss

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 8, 1986PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of three presentments filed by the District 11-A Ethics Committee (the Ethics Committee), which concluded in each matter that respondent had committed unethical conduct. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) agreed with the Ethics Committee’s finding of unethical conduct, and recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year. Our independent review of the record leads us to accept that recommendation.

I

Respondent, a sole practitioner, was admitted to practice law in New Jersey in 1974. He is also admitted in New York and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re DolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. In Re KampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. In Re PalmieriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Matter of SilvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Matter of HumenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Matter of LennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API