Legal Opinion

In Re Barrett

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 14, 1982PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

After considering five complaints against respondent, the District IX Ethics Committee for Monmouth County issued presentments on three of the matters and recommended private reprimands on two. The Disciplinary Review Board agreed that Barrett had engaged in unethical conduct. After a hearing, the Board recommended that respondent be disbarred and reimburse the Administrative Office of the Courts for appropriate adminis trative costs, including preparation of transcripts and cost of mailing.

Our independent review of the entire record leads us to the conclusion that respondent has indeed been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re CarlsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. In Re HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. In Re GallopSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. In Re ContiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  5. In Re FriedlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics OfficersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Matter of ReissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of SmyzerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Matter of HumenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. In Re KatzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API