Legal Opinion

Matter of Surgent

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 11, 1986PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arose from a motion filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB), seeking final discipline of respondent, John W. Surgent, II, pursuant to Rule 1:20-6. The motion was based on respondent’s criminal conviction in this State of conspiracy to commit theft by deception, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and 2C:20-4, and his conviction in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, of 14 felony offenses that included conspiracy, stock fraud, sale of unregistered securities, and subornation of perjury, contrary to 15…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. In Re RosenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. In Re MischlichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Matter of LunettaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Matter of GoldbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Matter of ZauberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. MATTER OF LaVIGNESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API