Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Fryberger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1951No. 35,254PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in a personal injury action after the trial court had granted defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict.

Defendants own and maintain their home in the city of Duluth. On July 9, 1948, they employed plaintiff, a woman 65 years of age, as a domestic servant in their home. Plaintiff commenced work in defendants’ home the following day. Shortly before plaintiff’s employment, defendants had remodeled their kitchen. In the process, new kitchen cabinets were installed. With the exception of the particular cabinet…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Rue v. WendlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Stewart v. Kroger Gro., Etc., Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Blomberg v. TrupukkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. Montgomery WardArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Austin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Hellman v. Julius Kolesar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API