Legal Opinion

Bethea v. Forbes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1988PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.*

The appellants herein, who were co-plaintiffs in a tort action against a motorist who had become uninsured because of the insolvency of his liability carrier, seek reversal of an order by the trial court dismissing their lawsuit. The trial court predicated its order on the fact that the plaintiffs had received payments pursuant to the uninsured motorist coverage in the automobile insurance policy of one of their group. The court reached a legal conclusion that the settlement was such as would preclude the plaintiffs from obtaining any further recovery under The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Corcoran v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Offensend v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Pavorsky v. EnglesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Luko v. Lloyd's LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Incollingo v. MaurerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Urban v. LohamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Panea v. IsdanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API