Luko v. Lloyd's London
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
In this declaratory judgment action appeal is taken from an order granting summary judgment to appellees Independent Pier Company and Michael Luko. We are asked to decide whether coverage provided by the Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Association Act (the PIGA Act), 40 P.S. § 1701.101 et seq. can be substituted as underlying insurance for the benefit of an excess insurer when the underlying insurer becomes insolvent and where the excess policy contains an unambiguous clause providing for excess coverage to begin at a substantially lower amount should there be no underlying…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Koval v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bethea v. ForbesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company v. Christian J. Pilosi James C. PilosiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. CorbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- American States Insurance v. State Auto InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.