Legal Opinion

Boring v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 13, 1969No. 6927DC318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallabd, C.J.

Defendant asserts that the question involved on this appeal is:

“Did the Court below commit reversible error in sustaining the *554verdict of the jury and signing judgment declaring Sabrina Shehan, the infant child of the defendant, to be an abandoned child within the meaning of Chapter 48 of the General Statutes of North Carolina?”

In this case, we are of the opinion and so hold that the trial court did not commit reversible error.

Respondent does not now contend that prejudicial error was committed in transferring this case to the District Court. See G.S. 7A-242.

Respondent’s assignment of error…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Adams v. Flora MacDonald CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Bair Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sims v. Virginia Homes Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. McIntosh v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API