Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1944No. 30411PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

1. The motions to dismiss the bill of exceptions are denied. While no parties are specifically designated as plaintiffs in error or defendants in error, the bill of exceptions indicates that all of the plaintiffs in the trial court except to the judgment, and • the acknowledgments of service by the several counsel for the defendants in the trial court cure the omission to specifically name the defendants in error, for the signatures of the acknowledgments are followed by designations of the respective counsel as attorneys for their clients in capacities of defendants in error.

2. While the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Baggett v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Adams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. McDougald v. DoughertySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. Evans v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ussery v. KochCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Brown v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Allison v. AllmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Johnson v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. McEntyre v. ClackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API