Legal Opinion

McEntyre v. Clack

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1961No. 38969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

Count 1 of the amended petition makes the following allegations with respect to the relationship that existed between the defendants:

Paragraph 6. “Under the terms of that written contract of fire insurance, . . . defendant (insurance company) acting for itself to comply with its obligation to pay for or restore the damaged parts of the property, and acting for (the landlord) employed (the contractor) . . . Plaintiff does not know, but defendants well know, the details of the contract of (the contractor’s) said employment.”

Paragraph 42. The insurance company and the contractor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Finley v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Arteaga v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Orr v. CooledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Spence v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Community Gas Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Studdard v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Bryant v. Motors Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Norton v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API