McEntyre v. Clack
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Count 1 of the amended petition makes the following allegations with respect to the relationship that existed between the defendants:
Paragraph 6. “Under the terms of that written contract of fire insurance, . . . defendant (insurance company) acting for itself to comply with its obligation to pay for or restore the damaged parts of the property, and acting for (the landlord) employed (the contractor) . . . Plaintiff does not know, but defendants well know, the details of the contract of (the contractor’s) said employment.”
Paragraph 42. The insurance company and the contractor…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Finley v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Arteaga v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Orr v. CooledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Spence v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Community Gas Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Studdard v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Bryant v. Motors Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Norton v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964