Legal Opinion

Lasecki v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The proof presents a very strong case of circumstantial evidence which warranted the jury in finding that the defendant killed the deceased, Armstrong. The defendant had suggested to others that they “roll,” that is rob, Armstrong. The defendant had a revolver which the jury was warranted in finding to be of the same caliber as that which was used when Armstrong's life was taken. Defendant had said that this gun would get Armstrong. The defendant was the last man seen wdth Armstrong while he was alive. Defendant was in the vicinity of the vacant house at the time the shot was fired which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ryan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Carthaus v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Radej v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. Roberts v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ameen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Payne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API