Savchuk v. Rush
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
On remand from the United States Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S.Ct. 2569, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977). For the reasons below, we distinguish Shaffer v. Heitner, supra, and hold that the assertion of jurisdiction pursuant to Minn.St. 571.41, subd. 2, as limited by our earlier decision in Savchuk v. Rush, Minn., 245 N.W.2d 624 *889(1976), vacated and remanded, 433 U.S. 902, 97 S.Ct. 2964, 53 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1977), is consistent with the standards established by International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dent-Air, Inc. v. Beech Mountain Air Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Fraley v. Estate of OedingOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Darr v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Control Data Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.