Legal Opinion

Fraley v. Estate of Oeding

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2014No. 2012-1994PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we address whether Ohio courts may exercise in-personam jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant based solely on the conduct of the defendant’s insurer. We hold that they may not.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} Appellee, David Fraley, d.b.a. Fraley Trucking, an Ohio resident, filed this negligence action against appellants, the estate of Timothy J. Oeding, J & R Equipment and Storing (“J & R”), and Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”), in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas. Fraley’s action arises out of a motor-vehicle accident that occurred in November…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. CUC Properties VI, L.L.C. v. Smartlink Ventures, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Stiner v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Simmons v. BuddeOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Hunter v. Rhino ShieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Keehan Tennessee Invest., L.L.C. v. Praetorium Secured Fund I, L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API