Legal Opinion

Modoc Land & Live Stock Co. v. Booth

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1894No. 18127PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

The plaintiffs brought this action to obtain a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, fourteen in number, from diverting any of the waters of the South Fork of Pitt river or its tributaries.

The case was submitted for decision in the court below upon an agreed statement of the facts, which are in substance as follows:

The plaintiffs own, in severalty, tracts of land in Modoc county aggregating fourteen thousand three hundred and eighty-two acres. The tracts are contiguous, and extend along and on both sides of the South Fork of Pitt river a distance of about twelve miles,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Edgar v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Heilbron v. 76 Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API