Big 5 Sporting Goods Corp. v. Zurich American Insurance
District Court, D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED.
I
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 27, 2012, Plaintiff Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (“Big 5”) filed a Complaint against Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), collectively (“Defendants”), asserting claims under state law arising from…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- OneBeacon America Insurance v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hartford Cas. Ins. v. Swapp Law, PLLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2018
- Citizens Insurance Company Of America v. Wynndalco Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022