Legal Opinion

Progressive Sales, Inc. v. Williams, Willeford, Boger, Grady & Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1987No. 8619SC1008PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ record on appeal presents twenty-nine Assignments of Error essentially alleging that most of the findings of fact below are contrary to the evidence presented. Plaintiffs’ brief contains arguments based on two of those Assignments of Error. Our review is limited to those two Assignments of Error. The re maining twenty-seven Assignments of Error not raised in the brief are deemed abandoned on appeal. Rule 28(b)(5), N.C. Rules App. P.

In general, plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred by allowing defendants’ motion for involuntary dismissal after plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Barnes Ex Rel. Underwood v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Little v. MatthewsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. C.F.R. Foods, Inc. v. Randolph Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Haas v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Hedgepeth v. Lexington State BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Inland Am. Winston Hotels, Inc. v. WinstonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API