Legal Opinion

Sheriff of Suffolk County v. AFSCME Council 93, Local 419

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 1, 2009No. 07-P-885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

In April, 2002, the Suffolk County sheriff determined that budget cuts required layoffs within the union’s bargaining unit. Because of the necessary layoffs, the sheriff informed the union that some remaining employees would be assigned to different shifts with attendant changes in scheduled days off and vacations. The union has consistently taken the position that these changes were subject to arbitration under the collective bargaining agreement (agreement). The sheriff, maintaining that the agreement precluded arbitration of shift changes and scheduled days off, brought a complaint in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Highway Department v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  2. Falmouth Police Superior Officers Ass'n v. Town of FalmouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Collaborative for Educ. Servs., Inc. v. Seiu Local 509Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API