Massachusetts Highway Department v. Perini Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
The defendants, Perini Corporation, Kiewit Construction Co., Inc., and Jay Cashman, Inc. (collectively, PKC), doing business as Perini-Kiewit-Cashman Joint Venture, appeal from a Superior Court order vacating arbitral awards in PKC’s favor and from orders on PKC’s subsequent motions for clarification and reconsideration. See G. L. c. 251, § 18. The awards were made pursuant to a 1999 agreement between PKC and the plaintiffs, the public agencies overseeing the Central Artery/ Tunnel Project (collectively, CA/T). The 1999 agreement provided that the parties submit a specific group of PKC’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. CollyerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
- Merrimack College v. KPMG LLPMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Harper Hofer & Assocs., LLC v. Nw. Direct Mktg., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Shalaby v. Arctic Sand Technologies, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014
- In Re Revo Mg, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.