Legal Opinion
Roy v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 9, 1997No. 95-319CPublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment.2 The issue to be decided is whether a genuine issue of material fact exists that would establish that certain Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “FBI”) agents possessed the requisite authority to bind the Government to an oral contract to pay an FBI informant for his services. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The facts in this contract action are undisputed, unless otherwise noted. In August 1987 the FBI arrested Rob Roy (“plaintiff”) for illegally aiding and abetting the distribution…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Fitzroy Gardiner, D/B/A Western Trading Enterprises v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority, Third-Party v. The Federal Emergency Management Agency the Army Corp of Engineers the United States Geological Society, Third-Party Virgin Islands Water & Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Jumah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- SGS-92-X003 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Aboo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.