Legal Opinion

Cook v. Knight

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 8, 1917No. 9591PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before Gary, J., Florence, November, 1915. Action by D. R. Cook and others against W. J. M. Knight and others. From an order denying their motion to make the complaint more definite and certain, defendants appeal. cites: Allegation as to discovery of mistake necessary: 62 S. C. 88; 77 S. C. 541; 94 S. C. 349; Code Civ. Proc., sec. 438. Laches: Ann. Cas. 19-15b, 313; 82 S. C. 264; 16 Cyc. 236, 267, 268; 11 Rich. Eq. 33; 10 R. C. E. 395; 2 Am.

Read the full summary

Before Gary, J., Florence, November, 1915. Action by D. R. Cook and others against W. J. M. Knight and others. From an order denying their motion to make the complaint more definite and certain, defendants appeal. cites: Allegation as to discovery of mistake necessary: 62 S. C. 88; 77 S. C. 541; 94 S. C. 349; Code Civ. Proc., sec. 438. Laches: Ann. Cas. 19-15b, 313; 82 S. C. 264; 16 Cyc. 236, 267, 268; 11 Rich. Eq. 33; 10 R. C. E. 395; 2 Am. St. Rep. 807; 52 S. C. 367, 368. . ’ cite: Order not appealable: 87 S. C. 257; 42 S. C. 547; 76 S. E. 193. Laches: 12 A. & E. Enc. PI. & Pr. 829; 49 Pac.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an action for the reformation of a deed. The complaint alleges that the deed was executed in 1872-, that the grantor died in 1901, and the suit was commenced in 1915. There is tio allegation as to the time when the mistake was discovered nor excuse for the delay of the plaintiffs in commencing the action. The defendants are the children of the deceased grantor, and the plaintiffs are the grantee and his children. When the complaint was served the defendants made a motion to make the complaint more definite and certain: (1) By…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Babb v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  2. Hagerman v. BatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. McAuley v. Orr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  4. Poston v. IngrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Wagner v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Wallace v. TimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. HEMINGWAY v. MentionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Thomas v. MacNeillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Byrd v. O'NealSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API