Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Timmons
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 6, 1958No. 17386PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
E. H. Henderson, Acting Associate Justice.
The exceptions are quite general and indefinite, and do not comply with rule 4, section 6, of the Court. However, we have decided to consider them, since they attempt to present meritorious assignments of error.
As the question in this case is whether the trial judge was correct in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the complaint, it is necessary that we see just what are the allegations of the complaint, and what is embraced in the demurrer.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the ancillary receiver in this state for the Keystone Mutual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cook v. KnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Wagner v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Tucker v. WeathersbeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Gary v. People's National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- Fallaw v. Oswald, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
3Cited by19 opinions
- Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. DriverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Aaron v. Hampton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Calvert Fire Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.