Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Sanders

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Benet, J., Charleston, May, 1896. Action by Julia E. S. Wagner, in her own right and as administratrix of estate of- Levi P. Wagner, deceased, William Wagner, Max Wagner, and Clement Wagner, against Joshua C. Sanders, H. G. Eeland, and J. B. Morrison.

Read the full summary

Before Benet, J., Charleston, May, 1896. Action by Julia E. S. Wagner, in her own right and as administratrix of estate of- Levi P. Wagner, deceased, William Wagner, Max Wagner, and Clement Wagner, against Joshua C. Sanders, H. G. Eeland, and J. B. Morrison. From an order by the Court below, on motion of defendant, Sanders, requiring the plaintiffs to elect on which cause of action they would go to trial, also to amend their complaint, the plaintiffs appeal. cite: Code, 138; 31 S. C., 527; 10 S. C., 101; 26 S. C., 474; 13 S. C., 444; Code, 139; 25 S. C., 72; Code, 143; 6 S. C., 14; Code, 188;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order, made pursuant to a motion to make the complaint more certain and definite by arranging the causes of action separately, to strike out redundant matter, to reduce the complaint to a single definite cause of action, to require plaintiffs to elect upon which of the several causes of action they will proceed. The complaint alleged substantially: (1) That on the 19th day of December, 1868, the defendant, Joshua C. Sanders, and Devi P. Wagner (now deceased), as copart-ners in planting interest, purchased a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cook v. KnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  2. Singleton v. SingletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API