United States v. Robert E. Landweer & Co.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge:
Defendant Robert E. Landweer & Co. (“Landweer”) moves to dismiss this action pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582(1) and therefore denies Defendant’s USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss. However, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Accordingly, Defendant’s USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss is granted.
Background
In its original complaint…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2012
- United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- E & S Express Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- United States v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
- United States v. SantosUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013