Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert E. Landweer & Co.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 8, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-17; Court 09-00060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Judge:

Defendant Robert E. Landweer & Co. (“Landweer”) moves to dismiss this action pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582(1) and therefore denies Defendant’s USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss. However, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Accordingly, Defendant’s USCIT Rule 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss is granted.

Background

In its original complaint…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2012
  2. United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  3. E & S Express Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  4. United States v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
  5. United States v. SantosUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API