Legal Opinion

Cappiello, Hofmann & Katz v. Boyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 2001No. A089477Published

1Opinion of the Court

105 Cal.Rptr.2d 147 (2001)

87 Cal.App.4th 1064

CAPPIELLO, HOFMANN & KATZ, P.C., Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Thomas J. BOYLE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

No. A089477.

Court of Appeal, First District, Division Three.

March 16, 2001.

Ordered Not Officially Published July 11, 2001.[*]

Law Offices of Thomas J. Boyle and Thomas J. Boyle, San Francisco, and W. Ruel Walker, for Appellant.

Mathew Stephenson, Kochan & Stephenson, for Respondent.

PARRILLI, J.

It is settled that interference with an unenforceable contract may give rise to liability in tort for interference with prospective economic advantage.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API