Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Washington Veneer Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1932No. 23770. Department OnePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action was originally begun in September, 1931, by Claude Calhoun. In his complaint, he alleged that at all times mentioned therein, respondent owned, managed and operated a large veneer manufacturing plant at Olympia, Washington, in which plant it manufactured veneer lumber, in the manufacturing of which it used large quantities of glue; that, in its mill, it maintained a workshop where machinery was used and manual labor employed by way of trade for purposes of gain, within an enclosed room, in which room it operated and conducted a glue mixing department where machines, or mixers,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Zajkowski v. American Steel & Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. Pellerin v. Washington Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Depre v. Pacific Coast Forge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Horner v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Johnson v. OttomeierWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Deggs v. Asbestos Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Piukkula v. Pillsbury Astoria Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API