Legal Opinion

Pellerin v. Washington Veneer Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1931No. 22996. Department OnePublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent sued and recovered judgment for damages, and this appeal results.

The complaint of respondent, in substance, alleges:

That respondent, a man sixty-two years of age, was employed.by appellant during the period from July 27, 1927, to March 5, 1929, in a veneer mill and work shop operated by appellant, where machinery . is used and manual labor is exercised for the purpose of gain within an encloséd room maintained by appellant, in which it operated and conducted a glue-mixing department where machines or mixers were used in mixing the several ingredients entering into the composition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Depre v. Pacific Coast Forge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Depre v. Pacific Coast Forge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Atwood v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Johnson v. Far West Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McCormick Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Triff v. National Bronze & Aluminum Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Metcalf v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Calhoun v. Washington Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Henson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API